Not the time to play politics
The BN-media got it wrong again and never seemed to understand why PAS is taking such a stance. If only this BN-media could understand it for once that all of our political positions must be premised on clear Islamist precepts usually verses of the Qur’an or authentic tradition of the Prophet Muhammad. If there are no such explicit sources we will have to resort to the Principles and Wisdom of the Islamic jurisprudence (Usul and Maqasid of Islamic Juurisprudence). We later look into how it contextualises into our current political and social realities.
Doing it the reverse order will befit a ‘pragmatic’ approach and conforms to BN-media’s idea of ‘playing politics’,the like of this article’a assertion. PAS is not into such game of ‘playing-politics’. This is quite unlike or plainly opposite to her political nemesis, where Islam is resorted to when it matters to their survival and conveniently debunked when it is a hindrance.
Because of such methodology, PAS has to sometimes suffer from taking very ‘fundamentalist and principled’ stand as in the case of our stand in relation to Hudud and Syariah etc. We don’t double-speak, much less ‘play politics’.
Very fortunately however, of late all our stands on the issue of Justice for All, war on racism and racial supremacy, name of Allah, against corruption and abuse of power, good governance, meriticracy, colour-blind affirmative action, etc, seemed to resonate well with the bigger constituency of Muslims and non-Muslims alike. PAS quite understand the ‘double-edged’ nature of these issues sometimes, given the 60-40 mixed demography, but we relentlessly make our position clear.
Umno feels threatened with this scenario and now makes a big meal of it, claiming that we have lost a bigger Malay support. This piece is surely one, where it is craftily written or ‘spun’ to achieve the similar objective that PAS is ‘playing politics’ again.
Politics is not a game to PAS. We are not here to play politics. Our raison d’etre is our platform of advocating Islamic Justice and Fairness to All. We seek the support and political mandate of the people, as we are a bona fide Islamist political party. As we are now in a Coalition Politics in Pakatan Rakyat, we collectively advocate the Common Policy Framework, CPF of Pakatan. If that is playing politics to some, especially the BN-media, so be it!
‘Not the time to play politics’
INSIGHT BY JOCELINE TAN
Sunday Star September 5, 2010,
PAS leader Datuk Nik Aziz Nik Mat won brownie points among the non-Malays for his defence of Teo Nie Ching’s faux pax in a Selangor surau. But compromising on such issues may have lost his party ground among the Malays.
SERDANG MP Teo Nie Ching rushed to the High Court on Monday morning in the hope of meeting Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat who was there for the Kelantan government’s suit against Petronas.
But when she got there, she was told the Kelantan Mentri Besar was about to leave for the mosque to perform sembahyang hajat or special prayers.
Teo was advised to go and wait at Kelantan House where Nik Aziz puts up when he is in Kuala Lumpur. Her persistence paid off and she met Nik Aziz for about 15 minutes over what some have called her political baptism of fire.
There had been an uproar when a photograph of the petite and pretty DAP politician making a speech in the Surau Al-Huda in Kajang appeared on the front page of a leading Malay newspaper.
The photograph showed her speaking into a microphone in the dewan solat or prayer court of the surau (No-no Number 1); her head was uncovered (No-no Number 2); and she was wearing a form fitting baju kebaya or what some have labelled an “SIA stewardess uniform” (No-no Number 3).
DAP leaders slammed the news report as “Umno-instigated” and accused the paper of blowing the issue out of proportion.
But behind the scenes, they knew the reaction among Muslims out there was not entirely about politics and they were concerned about how to handle the fallout.
Teo had crossed the line and this became all too clear when word came from the state government that the Sultan of Selangor, the Islamic head in the state, was upset about the matter.
From that point, the DAP defence that Teo had not done anything wrong ground to a stop and she was advised to apologise to the Sultan. Her letter of apology was handed to the Sultan by the Selangor Mentri Besar a few days later.
DAP leaders also approached their PAS colleagues for advice and that was when it was suggested that Teo should try to meet Nik Aziz.
The tvpas.com video of the meeting showed Nik Aziz doing most of the talking while Teo did all the nodding.
Teo is a practising lawyer, a vivacious speaker and fluent in Bahasa Malaysia. The novice politician made a huge impact in the last elections because she was such a natural and confident speaker.
But she has been under a lot of pressure in the last couple of weeks and seemed overwhelmed by Nik Aziz and was virtually sitting on the edge of the white sofa, her hands clasped on her lap.
Officially, the purpose of meeting Nik Aziz was for Teo to seek advice but the real aim was to signal to the Malay ground that Teo had been “absolved” of the faux pax by the Tok Guru.
“This is too much and in the holiest month for the Muslims. She ran to Nik Aziz because she wanted a political solution. If she really wanted religious advice, she should have gone to the mufti,” said pro-Umno blogger Zakhir Mohamed.
Teo has since resumed her Ramadan duties in more demure fashion, opting for the modest baju kurung and a variety of shawls for events at the surau or mosque.
PKR’s William Leong, the Selayang MP, also came under fire following reports in the same Malay daily that he had given a tazkirah or religious talk at the Masjid at-Fakwa.
Leong has been rather level-headed about the whole incident.
“I wouldn’t know how to give a tazkirah even if I wanted to. Besides, it is not as though I barged in and grabbed the mike. I was invited by the mosque committee,” he said.
But Leong probably came under less pressure because he is a man and a lot of activities revolving around the mosque are run by men.
A corporate lawyer, Leong’s experience of Ramadan before going into politics was breaking fast with his corporate clients in hotels. It has been a sharp learning curve and he now finds himself making donations to orphans, single mothers and the poor.
Actually, the relationship between politicians and mosques is an old story. Over the years religion has given politics and politicians a legitimacy that they would otherwise not enjoy among a large segment of Muslims and Malays and no other parties play it as intensely as Umno and PAS.
But non-Muslims making speeches in the prayer court is something else, hence the unequivocal response from the Selangor Sultan whose opinion about keeping the mosque and surau free of partisan politics is well known.
On Wednesday, the Selangor palace issued an order stating that non-Muslims are not permitted to enter the prayer court of mosques or surau without permission from the Selangor Islamic Religious Council (Mais).
Selangor is also touchy about politicians speaking in the mosque, no matter how well-versed they may be in their religious knowledge.
Earlier last month, when opening a religious primary school in the state, the Sultan had urged Muslims to step up efforts to overcome problems that posed a challenge to the institution of Islam. Among these challenges were the use of the word ‘’Allah’’ by non-Muslims, deviant teaching, misuse of mosques and social issues affecting young Muslims.
Clear signals on transgressions
The Raja Muda of Perak, Raja Dr Nazrin Shah, in a speech in Ipoh a few days after the incident, cautioned that “major transgressions in Islam begin from small acts” and that it could start from a surau, madrasah or masjid, or from a speech, khutbah, tazkirah or doa. There was no mistaking what he was referring to.
The two royals are sending clear signals on where they stand on religious matters.
There is no denying that reports on the Teo and Leong incidents were somewhat exaggerated especially the allegations that they had delivered tazkirah. If Teo was not even aware of how women ought to dress in religious settings, she could hardly be capable of a tazkirah.
At the same time, politicians like them are challenging stereotypical perceptions of the role of elected representatives. The new breed wants to be YBs for all races and that is something for everyone to think about in the new political landscape.
Several leading ulama such as Perak mufti Tan Sri Harussani Zakaria and Johor religious advisor Datuk Nooh Gadot jumped into the fray but most Malay politicians steered clear of it.
No Malay politician worth his salt wants to mess around with the palace and most have been in the game long enough to know the specifics of mosque etiquette.
PAS president Datuk Seri Hadi Awang, for one, was mum throughout. His silence was read as disapproval of what had happened. Party insiders said opinion on the matter had been divided at the PAS central working committee meeting last Sunday night.
But PAS intellectual and Kuala Selangor MP Dr Dzulkifly Ahmad said: “There is a great divide given the emerging two-party system taking place. The one willing to be in touch with the changing political landscape will be the one who will survive the new political contestation. It does not pay to take a jaundiced view of religion.”
Nevertheless, not everyone in PAS is happy with Nik Aziz’s stand. They say his political side seems to be dominating the ulama in him these days.
He had gone out of his way to defend DAP on the cancellation of the Malidur Rasul procession in Penang and the incident where Perak DAP leader Nga Kor Ming mispronounced Koranic verses.
More recently, there was the furore over the khutbah in Penang during which the imam neglected to pray for the Agong who is the head of Islam in the country but mentioned the Chief Minister’s name instead.
The debate among ordinary Muslims has generally not been sympathetic to Teo’s blunder. There are those who are clearly angry and feel she had not shown respect to their religious norms.
The more reasonable excuse her attire to ignorance but say she had transgressed certain boundaries by entering the prayer court.
“Mosques should be opened to non-Muslims but not the dewan solat and not in that kind of outfit. I’m not comfortable with that,” said one young Malay lawyer.
It is quite clear that DAP leaders work well with the consummate politician that Nik Aziz is.
He has become some sort of Band-Aid to the DAP when they stumble, fall and scrape their knee. To put it more bluntly, some think he has become an apologist for the DAP.
Those in Pakatan Rakyat call it coalition politics – that parties should help each other.
Nik Aziz won brownie points among the non-Malays but it is doubtful if he has won any ground among the Muslims on this issue.
The fasting month is a time for prayer, reflection and good deeds and Malay politicians often try to downplay politics during this special time.
But, said the well-known and controversial blogger Syed Azidi Syed Abdul Aziz also known as Kickdefella: “One political incident after another, this is a highly political Ramadan.”
what “that outfit” worn by Teo.. whose idea was it? political advise, to Nik Aziz.. religious advise, to mufti.. hikhik… stop joking la UMNO..
highly political ramadhan? so be it..
The Insight by Joceline Tan is shamelessly slanted to deride PAS.
Speaking from a theological viewpoint, the principles of PAS has been consistent since the dawn of time and solidly backed up Islamic theology and exegesis throughout.
That Joceline is a good journo. I think it is a fair comment. Its a reminder to Pas and PR this Ramadan
I was relieved to see the maturity of PAS leaders giving opinions and comments nowadays. Gone were the days when the comments were too emotional and uncalculated of the consequances to the perseptions of the present public.
When comments are based on the true facts of the Islamic knowledges, we can never be wrong. Only a matter time ,the public would understand and later appreciated it.
Selamatlah parti Islam melangkah,
Membimbing ummah ke medan siasah,
Berpedomankan Al-Quran & Sunnah,
Suburlah hidupnya dan pasti berbuah.
PAS 4 ALL.
And who is this Joceline Tan? What does she know about “playing politics”? She thinks PAS is playing politics. Blind I suppose. When the fact is, PAS has always been consistent with its stand as an Islamic platform from the time it was 1st established. Only those on the other side of the political divide are too blind to see through it.
Kuman di seberang laut boleh nampak, gajah depan mata tak nampak. Itulah sesetengah orang macam Joceline Tan.
Dear Dr Dzul
First of all, I have been following Joceline’s writing, for quite a while. From pre-March 08. I still read her column today, even though I have actually stopped reading the Star on other days. I still buy Star on Sundays, though, and one of the columns I habitually read, is that of Joceline. Not because I am an admirer; in fact, my reading of her column is almost always accompanied by a churning inside my stomach – I would label it disgust, I suppose. But then, why do I still read her op-ed then?
One thing you will always notice in Joceline’s writing, and that is she sounds like she has so much inside information about the on-goings in Malaysian politics, in equal measure from both sides of our political divide. She’ll throw in her observations as though she is a ringsider. For eg, consider how she reports, “Teo was advised to go…wait at Kelantan House where Nik Aziz puts up… Her persistence paid off and she met Nik Aziz for about 15 minutes…”
Where did she get info such as, “Teo was advised” (who ‘advised’ her?) , “Her persistence paid off” (how did Jocelin measure Teo’s “persistence”? ), or “she met Nik Aziz for 15m”? (Again, macam mana dia tahu ni semua?)
Or where did she come to her conclusion on, ” But behind the scenes, they (DAP) knew the reaction among Muslims out there was not entirely about politics and they were concerned about how to handle the fallout.”
Who told her that, DAP was “concerned”?
Even in her writings on UMNO, she seems to have an equal access to “first hand information”. And I’ll admit, this is the first time I’ve found a Star reporter who has equal access to political opposites. I can understand her “accessibility” if she was a neutral reporter, but that is where my doubt begins.
We all know she is anything but neutral, especially to the cause of Pakatan. Which brings me to my second point.
Notice how she skillfully skewers the op-ed, to make Pakatan look helpless, hapless, out of sorts, and even weak?
“Teo had crossed the line”
“Clear signals on transgressions”
“PAS president was mum throughout. His silence was read as disapproval of what had happened.”
“DAP leaders work well with….Nik Aziz is. He has become some sort of Band-Aid to the DAP when they stumble, fall and scrape their knee…. he has become an apologist for the DAP.”
Just look at the words she employs to describe: – Band Aid, stumble, fall, and scrape….apologist. Wanna bet that her statement re: DAP leaders work well with Nik Aziz, is but a time old tested method of getting the Chinese population to imagine a DAP co-operating with PAS to create an Islamic state?
This is, typical Joceline Tan method. Now, why do I still read her column?
Cos I think it shows me, to a certain extent, what UMNO is thinking of, in terms of strategising its move against PAS, and DAP, bearing in mind that Star readers are pre-dominantly the urban Chinese. Anything that could help in sowing the seeds of doubt, UMNO will employ.
I also read her column, because I think it helps me to have an inkling, of just how desperate UMNO gets, as the days goes by. The more she writes such spin, the more I know that UMNO’s substance continues to crumble. Her talent is in masquerading spin in between shades of truth, and in exaggerating common problems that exist in any organisation. If she wanted to spin on say, someone’s marriage, she could easily take a normal argument between a man and his wife, and write to make it look like their marriage is on the rocks.
My advise:- firstly, ignore her. The only folks who want to believe her, are those who have already made up their mind, long before 8/3/08. Other than those, only those easily fooled.
Else, you may want to advise your Pakatan colleges to avoid “leaking” information to her. I am assuming that this may be possible if someone from Pakatan provides her with free flow details….though if that is the case, I then wonder, which Pakatan team member in his/her right mind would want to give an audience with a well know UMNO spin doctor?
On a final note, this is the same Joceline that commented, as we were approaching the day of 8/3/08, that Chinese voters were not so interested on issues such as corruption, as they were with the economy and cari makan issues. For certain she was trying hard to paint a positive picture for the then administration.
I’m now thinking that Joceline must have hoped that people have forgotten that statement. Well, I still remember reading that one.
Maybe Pakatan should put Joceline & Star on the back foot.
Hi Jeyenjr et al,
Thnx for all ur critical comments arguably very level-headed and fair to an equally v critical write-up of Joceline. I’m very encouraged and consoled that we are now able to engage critically yet maintaing our composure and objectivity. Im not saying that she must stop writng such pieces. On the contrary, perhaps she must continue to check and balance the Pakatan. Personally i welcomed that. But one who dares to criticise must likewise be ready to be subjected to criticism. I’ve always said that I’m an Islamist Democrat- I respect her right to her opinion and I may or may not agree with her. But I’ve equally my right to my opinion. And frankly i think she misses an impt pt again- we are not here to play politics.- it reduces our entire islamic struggle to v parochial-partisan interest. Bluntly, we are not here for the mere votes only, although that determine our survival. We first have our principles, values and vision to uphold. We want to be voted in for the right reasons, not to merely wrestle power and hope to do other things once mandated. That will be the greatest folly. Regarddless, these engagements are good signs and prognosis for a better Msia.
Dr Dzul, you must introduce me to this Jayenjr who reads the papers so so thoroughly. I agree with you – we should respect each other’s right to disagree. But are you sure that politicians are not here to play politics? Niot all are as altruistic as you, I’m afraid.